Habr and comments on spelling
once again stumbled upon the discussion in the comments of the type: what is the author illiterate, that's how many errors to fix something or that article. In this discussion usually zateplitsya for some change and leaves a sort of "bed sheets" absolute nonsense "off topic" on two or three screens. For the reference to "fabricate" at the time the public began to kill than still adjusted position, and a large majority of reviews in Topeka does not begin with "Harakat, plizzz", and as a result, if a person forgot "to throw", he politely remind you about this in PM. In the case of the spelling right-the opposite situation. Some simply unbearable quibble over a comma or a point, or to writing words. No, I don't mind, on the contrary — it is right, correct. But... it is not written in private messages, but left the first(second) review. But it's not for those who are reading topic in most (except of course the frankly idiotic mistakes that is the meaning).
From here came the idea of a small service comments: for each article a person can leave the link the same review your notes about the found errors. Initially, these comments are hidden, and only those who actually help or want to help in the search for errors will reveal this service and unsubscribe. In other places, such comments shall be stopped (but in the presence of such a service to the public, in principle on their own and will stop). A reward system pros and cons those who help to correct the mistakes was not canceled.
The pros are obvious. Comments be cleaner, without the so-called "official information". But at the same time retaining the possibility of leaving a review for filing error information and everyone can see who left a comment on a topic, and therefore "out" on some of the highlights.
Article based on information from habrahabr.ru
From here came the idea of a small service comments: for each article a person can leave the link the same review your notes about the found errors. Initially, these comments are hidden, and only those who actually help or want to help in the search for errors will reveal this service and unsubscribe. In other places, such comments shall be stopped (but in the presence of such a service to the public, in principle on their own and will stop). A reward system pros and cons those who help to correct the mistakes was not canceled.
The pros are obvious. Comments be cleaner, without the so-called "official information". But at the same time retaining the possibility of leaving a review for filing error information and everyone can see who left a comment on a topic, and therefore "out" on some of the highlights.
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий